<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing Stephen Leighton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/</link>
	<description>dirtydirtydirty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:48:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twelve Month Review part 2 &#171; Has Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/comment-page-1/#comment-319</link>
		<dc:creator>Twelve Month Review part 2 &#171; Has Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 14:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirtycup.com/?p=283#comment-319</guid>
		<description>[...] was also honoured to be asked to guest blog post on Dirty Cup at the link here. It was a real month of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was also honoured to be asked to guest blog post on Dirty Cup at the link here. It was a real month of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim grant</title>
		<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>jim grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 21:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirtycup.com/?p=283#comment-156</guid>
		<description>hi all nice to see steve on this site,im in scotland and love the beans and service i get from hasbean,not going to ramble on but have been enjoying an amazing yirgacheffe this week as espresso.learning loads from you all jim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi all nice to see steve on this site,im in scotland and love the beans and service i get from hasbean,not going to ramble on but have been enjoying an amazing yirgacheffe this week as espresso.learning loads from you all jim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirtycup.com/?p=283#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Ah, that was an incredible, unrepeatable cup, wasn&#039;t it? Good point about the enjoyment of coffee - never its fullest unless it is shared with someone. That is the truth to me as well. I guess its that way with anything; the sharing is a X modifier to the experience. Remember the fresh keg room at the top of the mountain in Boulder? I know you do and that was a singular drink experience that will never be recreated. I think we may have to write on post on this concept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that was an incredible, unrepeatable cup, wasn&#8217;t it? Good point about the enjoyment of coffee &#8211; never its fullest unless it is shared with someone. That is the truth to me as well. I guess its that way with anything; the sharing is a X modifier to the experience. Remember the fresh keg room at the top of the mountain in Boulder? I know you do and that was a singular drink experience that will never be recreated. I think we may have to write on post on this concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCsKiller</title>
		<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>DCsKiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 19:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirtycup.com/?p=283#comment-150</guid>
		<description>I am not a roaster, a barista or even that great at making consistant steamed milk, but I know what my senses tell me when I taste a great brew, whether its a shot, press or drip...and to wall a coffee in to a particular roasting profile or brewing method eqates to the idea that only African coffees are the best or that an S.L. 28 can only be grown to its best in Panama. Its all conjecture and opinion(within the boundries of reality). My perfect cup is not your perfect cup-and my perfect cup today, may not be my perfect cup tomorrow- it&#039;s an unnattainable, perpetually moving, Holy Grail,(OK i was going to get into the infinite variables- but we could not possibly account for them all) but that doesn&#039;t mean we should stop trying- some times theres a lot of consideration put into getting there, sometimes it&#039;s a mistake you cannot recreate.
If you get that &quot;perfect cup&quot;, enjoy it for what it is, then look for the next one
If you love it for what it is and...
If people(and I mean the general public) like your attempts at creating that perfect cup, you can make a lot of money- If you persue it- at the very least, you will make a lot of friends- which brings us to the crux... the &quot;perfect Cup&quot; must be shared among friends or it is meaningless
(simple and cliche- but true) 
Mine #1: Anohki Liberica, Christmas 2007- Blueberry, semi sweet chocolate, almond cream with a clean, soft finish-
with the Safehouse Family</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not a roaster, a barista or even that great at making consistant steamed milk, but I know what my senses tell me when I taste a great brew, whether its a shot, press or drip&#8230;and to wall a coffee in to a particular roasting profile or brewing method eqates to the idea that only African coffees are the best or that an S.L. 28 can only be grown to its best in Panama. Its all conjecture and opinion(within the boundries of reality). My perfect cup is not your perfect cup-and my perfect cup today, may not be my perfect cup tomorrow- it&#8217;s an unnattainable, perpetually moving, Holy Grail,(OK i was going to get into the infinite variables- but we could not possibly account for them all) but that doesn&#8217;t mean we should stop trying- some times theres a lot of consideration put into getting there, sometimes it&#8217;s a mistake you cannot recreate.<br />
If you get that &#8220;perfect cup&#8221;, enjoy it for what it is, then look for the next one<br />
If you love it for what it is and&#8230;<br />
If people(and I mean the general public) like your attempts at creating that perfect cup, you can make a lot of money- If you persue it- at the very least, you will make a lot of friends- which brings us to the crux&#8230; the &#8220;perfect Cup&#8221; must be shared among friends or it is meaningless<br />
(simple and cliche- but true)<br />
Mine #1: Anohki Liberica, Christmas 2007- Blueberry, semi sweet chocolate, almond cream with a clean, soft finish-<br />
with the Safehouse Family</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/comment-page-1/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 21:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirtycup.com/?p=283#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Tim,

thanks for getting in here. Agreed, again, on all counts. However, while roast profiling varies greatly from drip (even brew style) to espresso, I am always open to the serendipity of a bean falling in that mythic region where it sings as both. As I said, I just have to be in the temperament for a more acidic, bracingly bright espresso from a bean not specifically roasted for such, which I surely am from time to time! But of course, De gustibus non disputandum est. So much of what we are discussing is based on preference. For example, I do not value &quot;balance&quot; in an espresso nearly as much as many people and am always game for a beautifully unbalanced shot that sings two notes of a chord instead of three; that perhaps could have a more balanced &quot;voice&quot; if the roast was tweaked or it was blended with something else. I hold the Brian Johnsons of espressos in as high esteem as the Sinatras of same. Preference - its a bitch when trying to nail things down!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>thanks for getting in here. Agreed, again, on all counts. However, while roast profiling varies greatly from drip (even brew style) to espresso, I am always open to the serendipity of a bean falling in that mythic region where it sings as both. As I said, I just have to be in the temperament for a more acidic, bracingly bright espresso from a bean not specifically roasted for such, which I surely am from time to time! But of course, De gustibus non disputandum est. So much of what we are discussing is based on preference. For example, I do not value &#8220;balance&#8221; in an espresso nearly as much as many people and am always game for a beautifully unbalanced shot that sings two notes of a chord instead of three; that perhaps could have a more balanced &#8220;voice&#8221; if the roast was tweaked or it was blended with something else. I hold the Brian Johnsons of espressos in as high esteem as the Sinatras of same. Preference &#8211; its a bitch when trying to nail things down!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Varney</title>
		<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Varney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirtycup.com/?p=283#comment-146</guid>
		<description>The compromise in this subject is NOT to roast for different brew methods.

Yes, not all coffees are going to work as espresso and for, say, V60. But some work wonderfully for both brew methods. The key is to get the best out of them for the respective brew method via roast profiles. Cupping or brewing a coffee that has roast or smokey characters is ugly. It suggests your profile or roast degree is too dark - run this same coffee through an espresso machine, and it tastes beautifully balanced and sweet.

I think this conversation is touching on personal taste. My preference is to never, ever taste roast characters, baked characters or smokey characters in my coffee. This means we roast light, yet still ensuring the coffee has developed fully. Brewing on an espresso machine vs. brewing a coffee on a siphon or whatever is completely different. Which is why the roast needs to be different.

Our espresso roast profile is vastly different to our filter style profile in every way. It is almost like 2 different coffees. We will never sell anyone a filter style roast for use with an espresso machine and vice versa - instead we will recommend an appropriately roasted coffee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The compromise in this subject is NOT to roast for different brew methods.</p>
<p>Yes, not all coffees are going to work as espresso and for, say, V60. But some work wonderfully for both brew methods. The key is to get the best out of them for the respective brew method via roast profiles. Cupping or brewing a coffee that has roast or smokey characters is ugly. It suggests your profile or roast degree is too dark &#8211; run this same coffee through an espresso machine, and it tastes beautifully balanced and sweet.</p>
<p>I think this conversation is touching on personal taste. My preference is to never, ever taste roast characters, baked characters or smokey characters in my coffee. This means we roast light, yet still ensuring the coffee has developed fully. Brewing on an espresso machine vs. brewing a coffee on a siphon or whatever is completely different. Which is why the roast needs to be different.</p>
<p>Our espresso roast profile is vastly different to our filter style profile in every way. It is almost like 2 different coffees. We will never sell anyone a filter style roast for use with an espresso machine and vice versa &#8211; instead we will recommend an appropriately roasted coffee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirtycup.com/?p=283#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Stephen,

I agree very much with what you have to say here. Perhaps it is that we both studied at the cursor of sweetmarias in our formative years, but my belief is that when I get my coffee in, the bean is perfect and my job as roaster is to not muck it up. Because of this approach of wanting to take the bean to a drinkable state without transforming, but instead of preserving its qualities, I can only roast so far before I have to start weighing the trade off. What I mean is, at some point, if I am going to roast any darker, then I am trading sweetness, brightness, and terroir for something that is further along in the roast. Why would I do that? Just to shoe-horn the bean into a specific brew method (like espresso)? I refuse. Not to personify coffee into sentience, but if I am to honor the farmers and their labors, then I must honor the bean - let it be what it is without trying to mold it, like some unruly teenager, into something else. I have found that beyond the cupping table, that particular bean&#039;s favored brew method(s) will be found in testing on the bar. Right now, we have a Yirg that is improbably light in roast and is stellar in V60 and in a portafilter (if, of course, you have a taste for bright shiny espresso sometimes), but that doesn&#039;t mean I&#039;m going to try to make our Bali multi-task as well - it simply doesn&#039;t want to. Could I tweak the roast to make it servable as espresso? Maybe, but I am much more inclined to let it &#039;do what it do&#039; in a pour-over at what we think is its optimal roast. Some may see this as lazy by having coffees that have only one or two tricks, but we just have a more laid-back approach (a really labor intensive &quot;laid-back&quot; approach, mind you, replete with roast after roast, tasting after tasting, and a whole gaggle of Mojos).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen,</p>
<p>I agree very much with what you have to say here. Perhaps it is that we both studied at the cursor of sweetmarias in our formative years, but my belief is that when I get my coffee in, the bean is perfect and my job as roaster is to not muck it up. Because of this approach of wanting to take the bean to a drinkable state without transforming, but instead of preserving its qualities, I can only roast so far before I have to start weighing the trade off. What I mean is, at some point, if I am going to roast any darker, then I am trading sweetness, brightness, and terroir for something that is further along in the roast. Why would I do that? Just to shoe-horn the bean into a specific brew method (like espresso)? I refuse. Not to personify coffee into sentience, but if I am to honor the farmers and their labors, then I must honor the bean &#8211; let it be what it is without trying to mold it, like some unruly teenager, into something else. I have found that beyond the cupping table, that particular bean&#8217;s favored brew method(s) will be found in testing on the bar. Right now, we have a Yirg that is improbably light in roast and is stellar in V60 and in a portafilter (if, of course, you have a taste for bright shiny espresso sometimes), but that doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m going to try to make our Bali multi-task as well &#8211; it simply doesn&#8217;t want to. Could I tweak the roast to make it servable as espresso? Maybe, but I am much more inclined to let it &#8216;do what it do&#8217; in a pour-over at what we think is its optimal roast. Some may see this as lazy by having coffees that have only one or two tricks, but we just have a more laid-back approach (a really labor intensive &#8220;laid-back&#8221; approach, mind you, replete with roast after roast, tasting after tasting, and a whole gaggle of Mojos).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Walsh</title>
		<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>David Walsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirtycup.com/?p=283#comment-144</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not about shades of roast or preconceptions of what a brewing method can be. I would hope you didn&#039;t think I looked at the beans that sparked all this and made my decision on that basis. The fact is the Gayo, as filter tasted more of roast, and less of the coffee than I would like. Had I an espresso machine at hand, I would have happily used them for that purpose. I firmly believe there would be an alternative version of the Gayo, certainly ligther, perhaps with a tweaked profile that would deliver a great representation of that coffee when brewed as filter (there probably exists an equally light roast with a different profile that works great as espresso). 

So that is my logic. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s particularly revelatory, and I certainly hope I&#039;m not insulting the farmer or you (the roaster) to suggest this.

On your last point, I completely agree on the shades or roast for espresso. It is more about acidity and body than shades - though they are interrelated to a degree. Same/similar shade - different profile...ftw (out of my depth here - not a roaster)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not about shades of roast or preconceptions of what a brewing method can be. I would hope you didn&#8217;t think I looked at the beans that sparked all this and made my decision on that basis. The fact is the Gayo, as filter tasted more of roast, and less of the coffee than I would like. Had I an espresso machine at hand, I would have happily used them for that purpose. I firmly believe there would be an alternative version of the Gayo, certainly ligther, perhaps with a tweaked profile that would deliver a great representation of that coffee when brewed as filter (there probably exists an equally light roast with a different profile that works great as espresso). </p>
<p>So that is my logic. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s particularly revelatory, and I certainly hope I&#8217;m not insulting the farmer or you (the roaster) to suggest this.</p>
<p>On your last point, I completely agree on the shades or roast for espresso. It is more about acidity and body than shades &#8211; though they are interrelated to a degree. Same/similar shade &#8211; different profile&#8230;ftw (out of my depth here &#8211; not a roaster)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest blog spot on dirtycup &#171; Has Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.dirtycup.com/introducing-stephen-leighton/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest blog spot on dirtycup &#171; Has Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dirtycup.com/?p=283#comment-142</guid>
		<description>[...] a slightly ambitious plan, I was honored to be asked to guest blog on dirtycup blog, and kindly [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a slightly ambitious plan, I was honored to be asked to guest blog on dirtycup blog, and kindly [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

